StormProxies Alternatives

Swiftproxy and StormProxies are two quality providers in the proxy market. In this article, we will compare Swiftproxy and StormProxies, analyzing their key features to provide a comprehensive understanding, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific project needs.

A Brief Overview

Swiftproxy and StormProxies are two well-known providers in the residential proxy market. StormProxies is the more established of the two, with a longer history that meets various user needs and offers a wide range of proxy endpoints, making it a versatile choice for users.

In contrast, Swiftproxy offers competitive pricing and focuses on specialized proxies for specific use cases such as social media automation, SEO optimization, and online gaming. While its features may be relatively basic, its performance is highly reliable. Despite their different pricing structures, both providers are considered affordable options.

IP Pool Dimensions

A crucial consideration for residential proxy users is the size of a provider's IP pool. If the pool is small, there's a higher likelihood of IP addresses being reused, even with rotation, which can negatively impact performance. In addition, a larger pool provides more available IP addresses, greatly decreasing the chances of encountering duplicates. Let's examine how Swiftproxy and StormProxies stack up in this regard.

Swiftproxy

In terms of proxy pool size, Swiftproxy stands out with millions of IP addresses, making it one of the largest providers in the entire proxy market. It's important to note that in some cases, a portion of these IPs may not be online. This is not an issue unique to Swiftproxy, other providers face similar challenges, even if they don't openly discuss them. However, Swiftproxy does provide clear information about IP availability, which can help users manage their expectations.

StormProxies

StormProxies offers a relatively small number of residential IP addresses in its proxy pool. This limited pool can lead to inefficient IP rotation, resulting in fewer unique IPs available during use. Despite their rotation feature, users may encounter a relatively small percentage of unique IPs when using their proxies. While StormProxies does not disclose the source of their IP addresses, it is generally believed that they are sourced from Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks.

Proxy Quality

Proxy quality is a key criterion for assessing the effectiveness of a proxy; without good proxy quality, business operations can be challenging. Let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of the two providers in terms of proxy quality.

Swiftproxy

Swiftproxy's proxies work effectively as long as you don't overload them with requests. The speed is average, and delays are minimal unless you send a high volume of concurrent requests. In such cases, you may experience slower speeds and a reduced success rate for requests. To avoid connection errors, it's best to limit the number of concurrent requests. Despite some scalability challenges, Swiftproxy remains reliable and stable.

StormProxies 

StormProxies operates on low-powered infrastructure, leading to lackluster performance. With an average response time of 2.66 seconds, it ranks among the slowest residential services available. Its success rate is around 70 percent, meaning that 30 percent of requests result in errors like HTTP 502, SSL, or unknown issues. Although it supports IP rotation, the availability of unique IPs is quite limited.

IP Rotation Capability

The frequency of IP changes and the ability to maintain a session are crucial factors, meaning you shouldn't expect to keep the same IP address for extended periods. Compare their differences in terms of IP rotation and session management.

Swiftproxy 

In terms of flexibility, Swiftproxy effectively supports session management, allowing users to maintain an IP address for extended periods when needed. Its time-based system is reliable for users who require a stable connection.

StormProxies  

StormProxies employs a time-based IP rotation system. High-rotation proxies that change IP addresses after every request are not available; instead, you must keep an IP address for a minimum of 5 minutes before it can be changed. If you need to maintain the same IP longer, you can hold it for up to 10 minutes.

Available IP Protocols

There are several IP protocols, but for proxies, the most commonly used are HTTPS and SOCKS5. Not all proxies support these protocols, which is crucial for ensuring versatility and compatibility with various software.

Swiftproxy  

Swiftproxy supports both HTTP/S and SOCKS protocols, making them compatible with a wide array of automation software and suitable for diverse use cases. In terms of authentication, both providers offer username and password authentication as well as IP authentication.

StormProxies

StormProxies only supports HTTPS proxies and does not provide SOCKS proxies. Furthermore, they do not offer username and password authentication; the sole method available is IP authentication, which can take up to 30 minutes to activate after an IP is whitelisted.

Regional Coverage

Location coverage differs significantly among the two providers, which is important for users seeking access to geo-targeted content. Let's take a closer look at the location support offered by each provider.

Swiftproxy

Swiftproxy leads the pack with the better location coverage, offering proxies in countries around the world and in numerous cities. With their specialized proxy plans, users can select proxies from any country, thanks to their country-level geo-targeting feature. They provide IP addresses from North American countries (including the US and Canada), as well as from Europe, Asia, and Oceania, all of which support geo-targeting.

StormProxies  

StormProxies performs poorly in terms of location support. It only supports locations in the US and the EU, making it unsuitable for users who need proxies from other regions.

Conclusion

As long as you effectively manage the number of concurrent requests, Swiftproxy can deliver robust performance, along with good location coverage and a large IP pool. However, if you're on a tighter budget, you might consider StormProxies, but this option is only suitable for users who need US or EU proxies, can tolerate performance issues, and do not require SOCKS support, as StormProxies does not offer this feature.